DIY hydrogen power YOUR gas guzzler

you guys have been fed a lot.

this is a transitional solution, allowing us to use our existing vehicles as electric cars.
(there are many, and growing, ways of gathering energy, stored as electricity.)

1) electrolyze the water at the point of use in the car, of course not with coal or natural gas.
(and we will need to use electricity.)

2) feed the oxygen and hydrogen into the motor.
you think it's not less polluting than dumping 58000 gallons of bunker fuel into the bay i live on?

there are technical obstacles. what are you waiting for?

check out waterpoweredcar.com/herman (see the hermansinsight mirror), my beloved late great mentor.
he personally told me: "nothing is impossible."
please read the last sentence on that web page.

with love, my brothers.

got a better way? cold fusion? zero point energy? homoppolar generators?
by all means available, please let us all know.
we need to get out from under this.
seriously.

just for starters, so we're all on the same page:

www.hybrid-vehicles.net/bmw-hy...ars.htm

I've been prowling the net for DIY hydroxy boost info a lot the past few days. I think I'm going to try it out, just not sure I can make the time and energy happen. There are two main things going out there. One is Hydroxy assist which means you take some (most?) of the energy produced by your alternator and use it to break water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen by electorlysis. This HHO gas is then fed into your air intake or similar and is alleged to basically combust the fuel you are already using much more efficiently. % claims for MPG increases are all over the place. It seems like it must work from what I've seen out there. You can make these devices yourself, though there are a lot more people selling plans than giving them away.

The other thing going is the people claiming over unity by making and burning hydroxy. Mainly they are claiming that a dead guy named Stan Meyers was able to produce HHO by a method with resulted in a net increase in energy, meaning that if burned the gas gave off more energy than was consumed by the device used to make it. Therefore it could theoretically run indefinitely. The videos of Stan Meyer available on Youtube are thoroughly unconvincing. There are message boards and groups of people working on replicating this effect which it is claimed is not regular hydrolysis. Two people Ravi and Lawton are said to have replicated the effect and achieved much more energy produced than input. Ravi has videos of his replication at work and has posted plans for others to replicate. However, his video shows the ammeter clamped to the dc output of his power supply. As far as I know, clamp on ammeters are not accurate on DC. The only lawton videos show an ammeter, but you can't read it because the video is too blurry and you can't see what wires are going where. In other words, there is just no plausible proof that this stuff works. Maybe the other people working on it know something I don't, but as far as I can tell there is not much to go on besides good faith. Far be it from me to say that it is impossible or will never work. I'm genuinely interested, but extremely skeptical. No reason I shouldn't be and every reason that I should. If nothing else, maybe they are onto a more efficient way to produce HHO with pulsing DC. There certainly seems to be a lot of genuine enthusiasm. All I really see so far is a lot of rumors and the usual "we're very close" or "so and so has already done this for years" yet not even half-assed attempts at any real proof. Not enough for me to jump in the waters.

If I can get to the hydroxy boost experiment I'll certainly post back the results. Keep an open mind, but put a fine filter on the opening!